In order to further improve the level of investment decision-making in the open area, and strengthen the management of industrial projects to be evaluated in the area, combined with the park's actuality, the development of this interim measures.

One, the establishment of the project evaluation expert pool

from the management committee of the Economic and Technological Development Zone, the new district construction investment group companies, the community's various professional organizations, scientific research institutions, colleges and universities, and enterprises in the selection of a certain degree of professional and technical titles or a wealth of experience, composed of the Economic and Technological Development Zone management committee, the new district construction investment group companies, social professional organizations, scientific research institutes, universities and enterprises. The expert pool is composed of personnel with certain professional and technical titles or rich experience in the field, who are selected from the management committee of the Economic Development Zone, scientific research institutes, higher education institutions and enterprises. The expert database personnel to implement dynamic management.

Second, the project evaluation principles

(a) in line with the principle of industrial orientation. The introduction of the project is in line with the park's industrial development plan.

(B) the principle of conservation and intensive utilization. Improve the intensity of investment in fixed assets and land utilization. Promote enterprises to reduce the consumption of resources, energy and raw materials, reduce pollutant emissions, and improve the comprehensive utilization of resources.

(C) the principle of prioritizing quality and efficiency. Focus on the quality of the project, give priority to the introduction of high technology content, high value-added products, market competitiveness of high-tech industrial projects and strategic emerging industry projects, so that the quality, quantity and efficiency of the coordinated development.

(D) the principle of scientific and fair evaluation. The background of the project, products, technology, market, economic benefits, environmental benefits, social benefits and other comprehensive analysis to ensure that the project evaluation is objective, fair, true and accurate.

Three, the project evaluation process

(a) Determine the evaluation method. Review mode is divided into online written review and offline meeting review (project expert review meeting). Investment Promotion Bureau in accordance with the needs of the project, as appropriate, to clarify the evaluation method and the composition of experts to participate in the project evaluation, evaluation experts from the Investment Promotion Bureau from the project evaluation of the expert database according to the nature of the project and the professional randomly selected. Online written review in principle entrusted to a professional authority to organize expert review or from the expert pool to invite at least three experts to review; offline meeting review (project expert review meeting) in principle entrusted to a professional authority to organize expert review or from the expert pool to invite no less than five experts to conduct on-site review and designate an expert as the head of the review team.

(ii) Review implementation. According to the project's degree of environmental protection and safety production risk, process complexity, project investment volume, support policy appeals, emerging industry areas, etc., to determine the evaluation mode. Chemical industry, environmental protection and safety production pressure, support policy claims too high project, in principle, the use of offline meeting review, on-site review and other ways.

1, online written review

(1) Investment Promotion Bureau to write investment promotion inspection report, together with the collection of project proposals or project feasibility studies, sent to the review experts to seek expert advice.

(2) experts on the project proposal or project feasibility study report to put forward relevant views.

(3) China Merchants Investment Promotion Bureau timely feedback to the enterprise, the enterprise according to the comments to modify and improve the project proposal or project feasibility study report, and again sent to the review experts.

(4) experts on the feasibility of the project issued a written evaluation report.

(5) Investment Promotion Bureau of the evaluation report issued in a timely manner to collect, archive, for inspection.

2, offline meeting review (project expert review meeting)

(1) Investment Promotion Bureau to write investment promotion inspection report, together with the collection of project proposals or project feasibility studies, and before the meeting was sent to the participating review experts. At the same time, according to the needs of the project, experts can be invited to the enterprise for on-site review. If the project is relatively simple, less pressure on environmental protection and safety, high product maturity, experts can directly issue a project evaluation report after the on-site evaluation.

(2) experts on the feasibility of the project to issue a preliminary review.

(3) The Investment Promotion Bureau timely feedback to the enterprise preliminary review of the views, while seeking the views of the relevant functional departments, and according to the need to do other related work.

(4) Organize and convene a project expert review meeting for review, the relevant functional departments present.

(5) Participating project evaluation experts issued a project evaluation report.

(6) Investment Promotion Bureau of the evaluation report issued in a timely manner to collect, archive, and for inspection.

Four, the evaluation of expert requirements

(a) from the development of the development zone in the overall situation, according to the development zone by the development of industrial orientation and development planning, based on the actuality of the development zone, focusing on the long-term, and adhere to the sustainable development of the project to be pragmatic and analytical argumentation, independent, objective and objective. Argumentative analysis of the project, independent, objective and impartial to put forward their personal views.

(2) Strictly abide by the relevant confidentiality provisions, the results of the evaluation of the project and related information, in addition to personal data, shall not be transmitted in any form.

V. Evaluation of the subsidy criteria

(a) Online written review.

Each evaluation of a project, given 600 yuan / person subsidies.

(ii) Participate in offline conference review (project expert review meeting).

Foreign experts will be given a subsidy of 1500-2000 RMB/person; local experts in Suzhou will be given a subsidy of 600-800 RMB/person. Individual high-level experts can appropriately raise the standard of subsidies.

(C) accompanied by the open area out of the investment review.

Subsidies for 1000 yuan / person / day (food, accommodation, transportation are guaranteed by the open area).

Fifth, this approach has been implemented since the date of promulgation, the original "Notice on the Establishment of the Project Evaluation Committee of the Suzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone" and the relevant rules of procedure shall be repealed at the same time.